AionSi — Driven by Commitment
02ENGINEERING CAPABILITY

Design Verification

Coverage-driven verification confidence

Verification expertise across block, subsystem and SoC levels.

SystemVerilogUVMCoverageAssertions
01Specification
02Test planning
03UVM environment
04Stimulus / checking
05Coverage / regression
06Closure

Start with the engineering problem.

Choose the situation closest to your program to see the engineering impact, AionSi contribution and appropriate engagement path.

01
Customer situation

Verification capacity is constraining a block, subsystem or SoC milestone.

Specialist Engineering
Engineering impact

Regression, debug and coverage closure compete for limited senior engineering capacity.

AionSi contribution

SystemVerilog/UVM environments, stimulus, checking, coverage, debug and closure.

Engagement model

Specialist Engineering

Discuss Your Engineering Requirement →
02
Customer situation

Verification closure is becoming a schedule risk.

Managed Workstream
Engineering impact

Coverage gaps, regression backlog and debug demand can delay sign-off.

AionSi contribution

Defined verification workstreams from stimulus and checking through coverage and closure.

Engagement model

Managed Workstream

Discuss Your Engineering Requirement →
03
Customer situation

Multiple programs require scalable verification execution.

Dedicated Engineering ODC
Engineering impact

Hiring and coordinating teams across programs creates management overhead.

AionSi contribution

Dedicated verification engineering aligned to methodology and roadmap.

Engagement model

Dedicated Engineering ODC

Discuss Your Engineering Requirement →
SystemVerilogUVMCoverageAssertions
01Reusable verification infrastructure
02Coverage-driven closure
03Regression and debug execution
04Scalable engineering capacity

Evidence before claims.

Explore approved technical material supporting the engineering capability represented on this page.

01whitepaper

Reusable UVM Verification Architecture

Configurable SystemVerilog-UVM verification methodology covering reusable agents, drivers, monitors, scoreboards, coverage and assertions.

Technical evidence →
02whitepaper

PCIe 5.0 Data Link Layer Verification

Verification methodology covering ACK/NAK handling, replay buffers, credit-based flow control, error injection, SVA and functional coverage.

Technical evidence →
03whitepaper

HBM4e Memory Subsystem Verification

Subsystem verification covering controller, PHY, training logic, third-party model integration, functional coverage and regression automation.

Technical evidence →
04whitepaper

Processor-Based Verification Using ARM Cortex-M7

Software-driven verification covering memory access, register validation, interrupts and subsystem initialization.

Technical evidence →
05whitepaper

Formal Verification Planning with Cadence JasperGold

Structural verification planning for crossbar, multiplexer, clock, reset and overflow logic to complement simulation-based verification.

Technical evidence →
06case-study

5G Radio-on-Chip Functional Verification

Subsystem verification methodology combining reusable UVM infrastructure, MATLAB correlation, processor-driven verification, datapath scoreboards and formal planning.

Technical evidence →
07case-study

End-to-End IoT SoC Verification

IP-to-SoC verification scope including reusable environments, third-party IP integration, RTL verification, GLS and final verification sign-off.

Technical evidence →
08whitepaper

UFS 4.0 Low-Power Verification

Low-power verification covering PMU behavior, power-state transitions, clock gating, reset sequencing and UVM-based coverage closure.

Technical evidence →

Bring the engineering problem.

Share the program stage, bottleneck and required engineering capacity. We can map the requirement to the appropriate AionSi engineering model.

Discuss Your Engineering Requirement